Skip to main content
AI Hub
Home Browse Cases Countries Sources Explore Taxonomy About Submit
Sign In
DCI AI Hub — AI Tracker socialprotectionai.org/use-case/CHL-003
CHL-003 Exported 1 April 2026

SUSESO ML-Based Medical Insurance Claims Processing

Country Chile
Deployment Status Design & Development Phase
Confidence Confirmed
Implementing Agency Superintendencia de Seguridad Social (SUSESO)

Overview

Chile's Superintendencia de Seguridad Social (SUSESO), the social security and medical insurance supervisory agency, is developing and deploying machine learning models to assist its claims processing staff in handling a high volume of medical insurance claims. SUSESO's claims processing division has approximately 80 staff, some of whom are doctors and health specialists, who process approximately 200,000 medical insurance claims per year.

The World Privacy Forum (WPF) documented two distinct ML projects at SUSESO in its November 2024 report. First, a gradient boosting model to optimise management of medical leave claims, which was in the development phase as of that reporting. Second, classification trees for occupational mental health claims, which was already in operational use and undergoing a bias audit. Both models are managed by Rodrigo Moya, who heads SUSESO's Digital Transformation, Innovation and Project Unit in the Technology and Operations Department.

The governance context is significant and well-documented. Chile has developed an 'AI bidding template' through its ChileCompra public procurement system -- a government procurement tool that includes responsible AI criteria for assessing AI vendors. SUSESO's experience implementing this tool highlighted tensions between traditional procurement evaluation (cost, technical capability) and responsible AI assessment (fairness, discrimination risk, transparency). Kate Kaye, Deputy Director of WPF, published a follow-up article in April 2025 examining how Moya changed his perspective on the AI governance tool through the process of applying it to the medical insurance claims models.

When medical leave payments are denied, those decisions can and often do have life-changing effects on claimants, making the governance of the AI component a high-stakes question. The fact that SUSESO is conducting a bias audit on the operational classification tree model indicates awareness of these risks.

SUSESO is one of seven public institutions piloting GobLab UAI's (Universidad Adolfo Ibanez) Ethical Algorithms tools, as confirmed by an official SUSESO press release. The ethical tools applied to SUSESO's ML projects include an Algorithmic Impact Assessment, an Algorithmic Transparency Report Card, and a Bias and Equity Measurement framework. The audit process covers data sources, variables, parameters, bias, equity, transparency, accuracy, counterfactual analyses, and explainability mechanisms. Superintendent Pamela Gana and project manager Rodrigo Moya presented SUSESO's AI initiative at the second State Modernization Experience Exchange session (SIEME) organised by Chile's Ministry of Finance in October 2024.

Reporting by Diario Financiero (November 2024) provided additional detail on the scope of SUSESO's AI ambitions. The agency is developing six AI-enabled projects with a combined investment of approximately CLP $550 million, funded through State Modernization Secretariat grants and the Research and Development Agency. The flagship initiative is the predictive model to optimise medical license dispute resolutions, expected to integrate by mid-2025. A second project targets fraudulent medical licensing, described by Superintendent Gana as a tool to identify, investigate and sanction health professionals potentially issuing unfounded documents. Additional projects use NLP for claim classification and data analytics for systemic failure detection. Full implementation across all six initiatives is anticipated by Q1 2026.

SUSESO processes approximately 180,000 complaints annually, with medical licenses comprising approximately 70 percent of the caseload. The agency's engagement with responsible AI governance from the earliest stages of development -- including formal bias auditing, algorithmic impact assessment, and transparent procurement through ChileCompra -- makes this case notable as an example of proactive AI governance in a Latin American social protection institution.

Classification

AI Capabilities

Classification (primary)Perception and extraction from unstructured inputs

Use Cases

Operational and process automation (primary)Data quality and anomaly detectionDecision support for eligibility and benefits

Social Protection Functions

Implementation/delivery chain: Assessment of needs/conditions + enrolment (primary)
SP Pillar (Primary)Social insurance

Programme Details

Programme NameSUSESO Medical Insurance Claims Processing System
Programme TypeWork injury and occupational insurance
System LevelImplementation/delivery chain
Automation Subtype(a) Document processing and generative staff assistance

ML-assisted medical insurance claims processing system used by SUSESO to help approximately 80 staff evaluate approximately 200,000 annual claims related to medical leave wages and occupational mental health costs.

Implementation Details

Implementation TypeClassical ML
Lifecycle StageIntegration and Deployment
Model ProvenanceNot documented
Compute EnvironmentNot documented
Sovereignty QuadrantNot assessed
Data ResidencyNot documented
Cross-Border TransferNot documented

Risk & Oversight

Decision CriticalityHigh
Human OversightHITL
Development ProcessNot documented
Highest Risk CategoryGovernance and institutional oversight risks
Risk Assessment StatusFormal assessment

Documented Risk Events

WPF reporting documented tensions between traditional procurement criteria (vendor cost) and responsible AI criteria (discrimination, bias). Chile's AI bidding template implementation at SUSESO highlighted that minute decisions in AI governance tool design directly affect whether governance works in practice.

Risk Dimensions

Governance and institutional oversight risks

Weak documentation or auditability

Model-related risks

Opacity or limited explainabilitySubgroup bias

Impact Dimensions

Autonomy, human dignity and due process

Opaque or unexplained decision

Equality, non-discrimination, fairness and inclusion

Systematic exclusion from benefits or services

Safeguards

Bias auditDPIA/AIA conductedHuman oversight protocol

Deployment & Outcomes

Deployment StatusDesign & Development Phase
Scale / CoverageApproximately 200,000 medical insurance claims processed annually by 80 staff with ML assistance
Funding SourceSUSESO operational budget (Chilean government)
Technical PartnersNot publicly disclosed

Outcomes / Results

No published performance metrics or outcomes data. The WPF case study focused on governance process rather than system performance.

Challenges

Balancing vendor cost against responsible AI criteria in procurement. Limited staff time to analyse risks and impacts of AI alongside project delivery. Tension between policy aspirations and practical implementation of AI governance tools. Technical details of the ML system remain undisclosed.

Sources

  1. SRC-001-CHL-003 Kaye, K. (2024) 'AI Governance on the Ground: Chile's Social Security and Medical Insurance Agency Grapples with Balancing New Responsible AI Criteria and Vendor Cost', World Privacy Forum, 1 November. Available at: https://worldprivacyforum.org/posts/ai-governance-on-the-ground-chiles-social-security-and-medical-insurance-agency-grapples-with-balancing-new-responsible-ai-criteria-and-vendor-cost/ (Accessed: 30 March 2026).
    https://worldprivacyforum.org/posts/ai-governance-on-the-ground-chiles-social-security-and-medical-insurance-agency-grapples-with-balancing-new-responsible-ai-criteria-and-vendor-cost/
  2. SRC-002-CHL-003 Kaye, K. (2025) 'Why Rodrigo Moya Changed His Mind About Chile's AI Governance Tool for Assessing a Medical Insurance Claims AI Model', World Privacy Forum, 29 April. Available at: https://worldprivacyforum.org/posts/why-rodrigo-moya-changed-his-mind-about-chiles-ai-governance-tool-for-assessing-a-medical-insurance-claims-ai-model/ (Accessed: 30 March 2026).
    https://worldprivacyforum.org/posts/why-rodrigo-moya-changed-his-mind-about-chiles-ai-governance-tool-for-assessing-a-medical-insurance-claims-ai-model/
  3. SRC-003-CHL-003 Zecchetto, M. (2024) 'La estrategia de la Suseso para identificar licencias medicas falsas y mejorar respuesta a reclamos con IA', Diario Financiero, 12 November. Available at: https://www.df.cl/df-lab/transformacion-digital/la-estrategia-de-la-suseso-para-identificarlicencias-medicas-falsas-y (Accessed: 30 March 2026).
    https://www.df.cl/df-lab/transformacion-digital/la-estrategia-de-la-suseso-para-identificarlicencias-medicas-falsas-y
  4. SRC-004-CHL-003 SUSESO (2024) 'Suseso es parte de las instituciones publicas que participan del piloto para el uso responsable de inteligencia artificial', SUSESO. Available at: https://www.suseso.cl/605/w3-article-731254.html (Accessed: 30 March 2026).
    https://www.suseso.cl/605/w3-article-731254.html

How to Cite

DCI AI Hub (2026). 'SUSESO ML-Based Medical Insurance Claims Processing', AI Hub AI Tracker, case CHL-003. Digital Convergence Initiative. Available at: https://socialprotectionai.org/use-case/CHL-003

Back to case page
AI Hub

Digital Convergence Initiative - AI Hub

Responsible, ethical use of AI in social protection

MarketImpact Platform developed by MarketImpact Digital Solutions
Co-funded by European Union and German Cooperation. Coordinated by GIZ, ILO, The World Bank, Expertise France, and FIAP.